Every output peer reviewed: the QA panel's first year

The Centre's quality assurance panel reviewed the output of every engagement closed in the period, against IFRS, ISA and COSO.

That is the structural difference between the Centre and a consultant. A single expert's judgement is a single point of failure, and the network has relied on it for a long time.

Peer review costs delivery time. It is funded from core contributions rather than charged to the Society, which is why it survives when a schedule slips.

Definitions and current figures for every published indicator are on the results pages, each carrying the date it was drawn.